billythehick Vs. godzilla
i've been doing my blogging elsewhere for the last while.
the act of blogging is a bizarre practice, as the majority of those who read will have no context in which to put the text. so it is less the construction of a story, or the construction of a diary, so much as the construction of an identity.
so on other sites where i write the know me only from what i tell them, and how i tell it.
a less scrupulous writer might take advantage of this to make himself seem an avatar of humanity at its peak, telling the right sorts of stories, giving the right sorts of opinions and so on. not so with me, i give you the good, i give you the bad. i'm not entirely honest but anything i write will always be true to at least one person at the time of writing.
however, to give the grislier details, to give the coldest, most wretched parts of yourself to the text, to let every pathetic aspect of your worthlessness to the text, it has precisely the opposite effect it logically should.
if you face your flaws in the most attention-seeking way possible people mostly don't see it as pathetic, they actually see at as a sign of bravery, a sign of honour.
you may decide for yourself whether they are right. do you see honour in being openly pathetic?
back to the idea of a construction of a personality for a second. the modern age of creating an online self has led to the sale of these lives on ebay, amazon, elsewhere. i could even sell the personality i'm showing you now, how do even know that i'm writing this, and someone else hasn't found the password and is doing this in the blogger's name?
kafka-esque, non?
but what a personality it is that a draw here. the friends that know where to find it find it both fascinating and horrifying. and such is the human mind.
i've just randomly thought up a daft joke, and rather than work out a way to weave it seamlessly into the text, giving the illusion that i'm a better writer than i am, i shall simply throw it at you:
you might dislike me for my flaws, but i'm only human.
but then again, so was hitler.
ah wit.
i have no topic to discuss. as i said to my oldest friend the other day (though if you subtract all the time she's been angry with me over the years (usually entirely justly) we've probably only been friends about a week) "i'm as newsless as i am useless"
i would discuss plans, but you see i've decided that plans are meaningless if they are said aloud before they are enacted. it's become a worrying trend throughout my life that i think up a cunning plan, and then tell someone, so that they know how cunning i am, and then... nothing.
a wise fool if ever there was one.
as a matter of fact i even procrastinate in my blogging. i was in a set of nude crowd photographs a few weeks ago. i took a few notes shortly afterward so i'd have something to write about when i eventually blog it, the intention to do a proper essay-style thingamabob on it.
what kind of a story do you see emerging in the chapters to come?
say this is a book, which maybe it is, say that there is X number of pages left, what do you think's gonna happen?
so far it's certainly been an interesting chronicle of a beautiful mind (abridged) but where exactly is it all going? if i one day become someone important then that makes this an account of how i got from here to there, to see what seeds were sown which led to my eventual emergence as whatever.
but that may not happen, maybe this is it, reams of mental masturbation about actual masturbation. what the hell is that? is that a book?
cos this is essentially the same chapter written again and again, by a slightly different person.
and i'm in this endless battle to be something other than what i am, and it proves entirely fruitless.
alternatively you could say that i'm endless becoming who i am, or who i'm supposed to be.
"a certain point of view" and all that.
of all the thoughts that go through my head, most of them are things i have thought before but not said, and due to the amount of bullshit that spills out of my mouth it becomes hard to tell what's what.
and when you add all this writing to the mix, and the many different places i write, and the many different selves i write as, and the many different people that read different things here and there, i really have no idea what i've written before.
including the above sentence. i'm sure if i combed through the archives long enough i'd find myself reading something similar.
if you're a long-time reader of this (in which case i probably know you) then you may find yourself finding it all very familiar. doubly so if this is a book.
'tis an odd book, isn't it? a self aware narrator writing a book that hadn't yet become a book at time of writing.
what a strange occurence i never become anything other than the man who wrote his memoirs.
i could put some effort into being unique, and become the man who wrote his memoirs in advance, but i'd probably give up after the first chapter.
a real-time memoir is a far easier option. still not settled on an ending though.
this post was written across two different days, divided by a further two days. by this extention it was written by two different people. did you notice?
in writing this entry i was reminded a lot of what i've been told about The Portrait of Dorian Grey. never actually read it though. such is the wonder of a vague cultural awareness.
i am a scholar of the backs of books.
the act of blogging is a bizarre practice, as the majority of those who read will have no context in which to put the text. so it is less the construction of a story, or the construction of a diary, so much as the construction of an identity.
so on other sites where i write the know me only from what i tell them, and how i tell it.
a less scrupulous writer might take advantage of this to make himself seem an avatar of humanity at its peak, telling the right sorts of stories, giving the right sorts of opinions and so on. not so with me, i give you the good, i give you the bad. i'm not entirely honest but anything i write will always be true to at least one person at the time of writing.
however, to give the grislier details, to give the coldest, most wretched parts of yourself to the text, to let every pathetic aspect of your worthlessness to the text, it has precisely the opposite effect it logically should.
if you face your flaws in the most attention-seeking way possible people mostly don't see it as pathetic, they actually see at as a sign of bravery, a sign of honour.
you may decide for yourself whether they are right. do you see honour in being openly pathetic?
back to the idea of a construction of a personality for a second. the modern age of creating an online self has led to the sale of these lives on ebay, amazon, elsewhere. i could even sell the personality i'm showing you now, how do even know that i'm writing this, and someone else hasn't found the password and is doing this in the blogger's name?
kafka-esque, non?
but what a personality it is that a draw here. the friends that know where to find it find it both fascinating and horrifying. and such is the human mind.
i've just randomly thought up a daft joke, and rather than work out a way to weave it seamlessly into the text, giving the illusion that i'm a better writer than i am, i shall simply throw it at you:
you might dislike me for my flaws, but i'm only human.
but then again, so was hitler.
ah wit.
i have no topic to discuss. as i said to my oldest friend the other day (though if you subtract all the time she's been angry with me over the years (usually entirely justly) we've probably only been friends about a week) "i'm as newsless as i am useless"
i would discuss plans, but you see i've decided that plans are meaningless if they are said aloud before they are enacted. it's become a worrying trend throughout my life that i think up a cunning plan, and then tell someone, so that they know how cunning i am, and then... nothing.
a wise fool if ever there was one.
as a matter of fact i even procrastinate in my blogging. i was in a set of nude crowd photographs a few weeks ago. i took a few notes shortly afterward so i'd have something to write about when i eventually blog it, the intention to do a proper essay-style thingamabob on it.
what kind of a story do you see emerging in the chapters to come?
say this is a book, which maybe it is, say that there is X number of pages left, what do you think's gonna happen?
so far it's certainly been an interesting chronicle of a beautiful mind (abridged) but where exactly is it all going? if i one day become someone important then that makes this an account of how i got from here to there, to see what seeds were sown which led to my eventual emergence as whatever.
but that may not happen, maybe this is it, reams of mental masturbation about actual masturbation. what the hell is that? is that a book?
cos this is essentially the same chapter written again and again, by a slightly different person.
and i'm in this endless battle to be something other than what i am, and it proves entirely fruitless.
alternatively you could say that i'm endless becoming who i am, or who i'm supposed to be.
"a certain point of view" and all that.
of all the thoughts that go through my head, most of them are things i have thought before but not said, and due to the amount of bullshit that spills out of my mouth it becomes hard to tell what's what.
and when you add all this writing to the mix, and the many different places i write, and the many different selves i write as, and the many different people that read different things here and there, i really have no idea what i've written before.
including the above sentence. i'm sure if i combed through the archives long enough i'd find myself reading something similar.
if you're a long-time reader of this (in which case i probably know you) then you may find yourself finding it all very familiar. doubly so if this is a book.
'tis an odd book, isn't it? a self aware narrator writing a book that hadn't yet become a book at time of writing.
what a strange occurence i never become anything other than the man who wrote his memoirs.
i could put some effort into being unique, and become the man who wrote his memoirs in advance, but i'd probably give up after the first chapter.
a real-time memoir is a far easier option. still not settled on an ending though.
this post was written across two different days, divided by a further two days. by this extention it was written by two different people. did you notice?
in writing this entry i was reminded a lot of what i've been told about The Portrait of Dorian Grey. never actually read it though. such is the wonder of a vague cultural awareness.
i am a scholar of the backs of books.

